|
What is the GAP report?
The One World Trust's Global Accountability Report examines
the accountability of intergovernmental organisations (IGOs), providing
scores for their performance in two aspects of accountability: member
control of governance structures and access to information. The results
show wide differences between them, clearly indicating leaders in the
field and those that fall behind. (The report also examines other kinds
of international organisations - non-governmental organisations and trans-national
corporations - but they are not of such interest to this campaign.)
Why is this important? Three hundred IGOs help shape
the world we live in. The decisions they make affect all of our lives
in many different ways: from determining global financial standards to
deciding the fate of the world's refugees. Individuals and communities
who are affected by these organisations' actions should be able to hold
them to account. However, few mechanisms have so far been established
identified at the global level to enable citizens to exert such a right.
The result is a growing sense of disenfranchisement as a result of this
democratic deficit.
Intergovernmental organisations need to become more
transparent and accountable to their stakeholders, both those internal
and external to the organisation, to enable wider participation in decision-making.
This will increase their legitimacy and lead to more effective decision-making.
The full report is available from the One World Trust
at www.oneworldtrust.org or One World Trust, Houses of Parliament, London
SW1A 0AA (tel 020 7219 3825), owt@parliament.uk.
The aim of the Federal Union campaign
The aim of the campaign is to highlight the importance
of the accountability of global institutions and to encourage individual
institutions to become more accountable. While the OWT report looks at
organisations of all kinds, this campaign is focused on four intergovernmental
organisations that were most heavily criticised in the report. Federal
Union wants them to adopt democratic methods of decision-making in place
of diplomatic ones.
Why does accountability matter?
The intergovernmental organisations that were examined
are creatures of their time and place. The distribution of power among
their member states reflects the distribution of power within the wider
world.
In the case of international institutions that deal
specifically with money, for example in the World Bank, the different
financial contributions made are advanced as the reason for this distribution
of power. There are other ways of sharing out the votes that are used
in other organisations around the world: the reason here is not really
economic or financial, it is political.
In other organisations such as the World Trade Organisation,
where all member states are nominally equal, a separate, shadow decision-making
system has come into being from which the world's poorer countries are
excluded. The so-called Green Room system has established a private club
within the world's trade rule-making body. Its pretensions to equality
are undermined by such an approach.
In all these cases, the organisations concerned are
considerably less accountable than their national equivalents. Federal
Union argues that government power exercised at global level should be
just as accountable and just as democratic as government power exercised
at national level. If anything, given the greater distance from the system,
the demands of accountability are greater at the global level.
As in the EU, democratic practices at the global
level will come step by step. This campaign is one small part of that
process.
Next
|