|
Democracies may find it harder to go to war but they
do not find it impossible. As Sir Samuel Brittan acknowledges, the human
tendency to divide the world into in-groups and out-groups poses a permanent
problem.
Alexander Hamilton observed To look for a continuation
of harmony between a number of independent unconnected sovereignties situated
in the same neighbourhood, would be disregard the uniform course of human
events and to set at defiance the accumulated experience of ages
(Federalist Paper number 6).
That is why it is necessary to look beyond deterrence
and diplomacy and ask what it is that makes it possible for democracies
to fight wars against each other in the first place. Lower Saxony and
Bavaria, for example, are both democracies and may have disputes but there
is no threat of conflict arising between them. The reason is that neither
has absolute sovereignty, that is the right to make war. The right to
make war is a dangerous weapon in the wrong hands.
The member states of the European Union, in their mutual
renunciation of absolute sovereignty, are the best contemporary example
of how the threat of war can be banished. Perhaps a posthumous Nobel Peace
Prize is due to Jean Monnet.
This article was written by Richard Laming, a member
of the Executive Committee of Federal Union. He can be contacted at
richard@richardlaming.com.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily
those of Federal Union. 5 June 2004
|